
Baatin, left, for instance, seemed to have a strong connection with 'that space sh**'.
Okay, so here’s a thought: When people die, especially loved ones, we always have the tendency to attach the ‘rest in peace’ phrase to that person’s legacy. However, it occurs to me that, considering the physical and mental state of being that each of us is currently in, there must not be a lot of ‘resting’ going on at all once someone passes on.
If a dog is chained up in the back yard all its life, never having seen the outside world beyond that yard, when the dog is finally set free from the chain, you can imagine the dog would like to roam (that’s where the expression ‘let a dog roam’ comes from). Just the same, we have to realize that we are spiritual beings chained to a human experience. This physical world is very much limited in scope, as far as what we can do and where we can go. Many of us believe that, spiritually, there are entirely different laws of physics (for lack of a better description) that allow us to travel through space-time to locations we would never be able to reach in our lifetimes. I guess that’s just a supposition, but a good example of what I’m trying to say is the Tower of Babel.
I had a conversation with my dad the other day about this story, and it kinda struck me: Man couldn’t have actually gotten to Heaven just by building upwards. There’s no air up there, and there’s just space to be explored, no Heaven. No physical Heaven, anyway. Heaven is a place that you can only arrive at once you’ve shed your physical being (and in the case of some apparitions, your worldly attachments). Obviously there’s more to it in the Christian version than that, but you get the gist. Besides, we’ve already gotten there anyway, even AFTER we were disseminated by language and/or disposition.
So travelling through the cosmos takes more than just building a rocket. One can’t imagine that you die and just hang around Earth kicking rocks. I know I wouldn’t. And at least in physical terms, whatever method of travel you utilize as an ethereal being would seem to be the opposite of resting (getting back to the general idea of this post). A ‘dead’ soul would probably be so invigorated after shedding this entire dimension of stress, heartache, separation, individualism, and overwhelming disability (can’t fly, using 10% of brain, can only see in the ‘visible’ spectrum of light, about a 0.1% chance of telepathic abilities, etc.) that it would probably go frolicking in the wilderness of whatever’s out there to frolic in. Like a dog.
Again, there are biblical explanations for what happens when you die, but as you might have gleaned from at least this blog post by now, I’m a newborn skeptic. Newborn, meaning there’s still some things i’m wary about being skeptical about. But that’s an entirely different post altogether.
Either way, we shouldn’t necessarily wish someone rest when they pass on, but instead wish them a full new life with new experiences and complete freedom.